https://github.com/AccelerationNet/lisp-unit2.git
git clone 'https://github.com/AccelerationNet/lisp-unit2.git'
(ql:quickload :lisp-unit2)
lisp-unit2 is a Common Lisp library that supports unit testing. It is a new version of a library of the lisp-unit library written by Chris Riesbeck. There is a long history of testing packages in Lisp, usually called “regression” testers. More recent packages in Lisp and other languages have been inspired by JUnit for Java.
Recently longtime users at Acceleration.net felt motivated to refactor significantly, attempting to make some broad improvements to the library while maintaining its benefits and workflow
(lambda (body-thunk) (let ((*var* 1))(funcall body-thunk)))
(ql:quickload :lisp-unit2)
or ASDF
: (asdf:load-system :lisp-unit2)
.(lisp-unit2:define-test my-tests::test-subtraction
(:tags '(my-tests::bar))
(assert-eql 1 (- 2 1)))
;; with-summary provides results while the tests are running
;;;; using the context function
(run-tests :package :my-tests
:run-contexts #'with-summary-context)
;;;; using the context macro (does the same thing as
;;;; :run-contexts, See Contexts below for an explanation).
(with-summary () (run-tests :package :my-tests))
;; to print the results after the run is complete
(print-summary (run-tests :tags 'my-tests::bar))
;; The difference is in whether or not the output occurs while the
;; tests are running or after all the tests have run
;; to disable the debugger:
(let (*debugger-hook*)
(run-tests :tests 'my-tests::test-subtraction))
;; to debug failed assertions with the context function
(run-tests :tests 'my-tests::test-subtraction
:run-contexts #'with-failure-debugging-context)
;; or use the context macro
(with-failure-debugging ()
(run-tests :tests 'my-tests::test-subtraction))
See the internal test suite for more and better examples (internal-test/*)
The define-test
macro is the primary way to install a
test. define-test
creates a function with the same name as the test,
which can be called to execute the test. This is nice because there
is a direct way to call every test, but also because the test has
implicit source destination and thus “go-to-definition” on any
printing of the test name will take you directly to the test in
question. define-test
also creates a unit-test object and inserts
it into the test-database.
The test body is compiled at the time of definition (so that any compile warnings or errors are immediately noticeable) and also before every run of the test (so that macro expansions are never out of date).
package
: if package is provided the test name and all tags are
reinterned into that package before definition. This is mostly for
porting lisp-unit systems where test-names were not functions and so
tests could be named the same as the function they tested.contexts
(see Contexts below): a (single or tree of) context
fn that will be applied around the test bodytags
: a list of symbols used to organize tests into groups (not
hierarchical)Because lisp-unit2 keeps a database of tests and functions, removing a
tests is not as simple as deleteing the test from from your
file. Instead a function uninstall-test
and a macro undefine-test
allow you to remove all the runtime components of a test from
lisp-unit2. Uninstall-test
accepts the test's symbolic name.
Undefine-test
is a macro whose form mimics define-test, so that you
can simply add the two characters and compile the form to remove the
test. This also gives you the ability to easily leave tests in your
test file that are inactive currently.
The primary entry point for running tests is
lisp-unit2:run-tests
. run-tests
and get-tests
both accept (&key
tests tags package reintern-package) as discussed below in “Test
Organization”. Each test can also be run individually by calling the
function named for the test, and by calling lisp-unit2:run-test
which each return a single test-result
.
run-tests
returns a test-results-db, and aside from the keys above
accepts,
run-contexts
: a (single, or list of) context that will be
applied around the entire body of running the teststest-contexts
: a (single, or list of) context that will be
applied around each tests body. This will be around any contexts
defined on the unit testname
: a name used for this test run. Useful for identifying what
defaults to all packages being tested. We attempt to make a good
default if nothing is providedOnce you have a test-result-db (or list there of) you can call
rerun-tests
or rerun-failures
to rerun and produce new results.
Tests are organized by their name and by tags. Both of these are symbols in some package. Tests can be retrieved by their name, the package that their name is in, and any of the tags that reference the test.
The most common way to retrieve and run unit tests is run-tests which calls get-tests.
(lisp-unit2:run-tests &key tests tags package reintern-package)
(lisp-unit2:get-tests &key tests tags package reintern-package)
Both of these functions accept:
If no arguments are provided lisp-unit2 will run all tests in package
In some cases, particularly when converting from lisp-unit(1) we need
our tests to be in a different package (because tests are functions in
their name's package). In lisp-unit these tests would not conflict
with a function named the same (because tests were not functions). To
ease conversion, the reintern-package argument will reintern all test
names and tags provided into a different package. Define test accepts
a package
argument that mirrors this functionality. Suggested usage
is to either have tests be named differently from the functions they test
or to have tests and tags be in an explicitly referenced package, eg:
(define-test my-tests::test1 (:tags '(my-tests::tag1)) ...)
Tests are organized into the *test-db*
which is an instance
test-database
. These can be rebound if you needed to write tests
about your test framework (see the internal example-tests).
While lisp-unit does not have any specific notion of a suite, it is believed that the tests are composable enough that explicit test suites are not needed.
One suggestion would be to have named functions that run you specific set of tests:
(defun run-{suite} ()
(lisp-unit2:run-tests
:name :{suite}
{stuff to test} ))
(defun run-symbol-munger-and-lisp-unit2-tests ()
(lisp-unit2:run-tests
:name :symbol-munger-and-lisp-unit2-tests
:package '(:symbol-munger-tests :lisp-unit2-tests)))
(defun run-error-and-basic-tests ()
(lisp-unit2:run-tests
:name :error-and-basic-tests
:tests '(symbol-munger-test::test-basic)
:tags '(:errors lisp-unit2-tests::errors)))
Another suggestion would be to define tests that call other tests:
(define-test suite-1 (:tags '(suites))
(test-fn-1) ;; calls test-fn-1 unit-test
(lisp-unit2::run-tests ...) ; runs an entire other set of unit tests)
All assert-*
macros signal assertion-pass
and assertion-fail
by
comparing their expected results to the actual results during
execution. All other values in the assert forms are assumed to be
extra data to aid debugging.
assert-{equality-test}
macros compare the actual to the expected
value of each of the values returned from expected (see:
multiple-values) (eg: (assert-eql exp act)
⇒ (eql act exp)
) This
ordering was used so that functions like typep, member, etc could be
used as test.
assert-false
and assert-true
simply check the generic-boolean
truth of their first arg (eg: null and (not null)
assert-{signal}
and assert-{no-signal}
macros are used for testing
condition protocols. Signals that are expected/not-expected handled.
Actual values are compared to all expected values, that is:
LISP-UNIT2-TESTS> (lisp-unit2:with-assertion-summary ()
(assert-eql (values 1 2) (values 1 2 3)))
<No Test>:Passed (ASSERT-EQL (VALUES 1 2) (VALUES 1 2 3))
T
LISP-UNIT2-TESTS> (lisp-unit2:with-assertion-summary ()
(assert-eql (values 1 2 3) (values 1 2)))
Failed Form: (ASSERT-EQL (VALUES 1 2 3) (VALUES 1 2))
Expected 1; 2; 3
but saw 1; 2
Debugging is controlled by *debugger-hook*
(as is usual in common-lisp).
You can make lisp-unit simply record the error and move on by binding
*debugger-hook*
to nil around your run-tests
call.
If you would like to debug failed assertions you can wrap your call in
with-failure-debugging
or apply the with-failure-debugging-context
to the unit-test run.
All output is printed to *test-stream*
(which by default is
*standard-output*
). Most forms do not output results by default,
instead returning a result object. All results objects can be printed
(to *test-stream*
) by calling print-summary
on the object in
question.
print-summary
prints information about passing as well as failing
tests. print-failure-summary
can be called to print only messages
about failures, warnings, errors and empty tests (empty tests had no
assertions). Care is taken to print tests with their short, but still
fully packaged symbol-name (so that go-to-definition) works.
When running interactively with-summary(-context)
can provide
real-time output, printing start messages and result messages for each
test. with-assertion-summary(-context)
provides even more detailed
output printing a message for each assertion passed or failed.
Test results (from one or many runs) can be captured using
with-test-results
. The arg: collection-place
will copy all the
results as they arrive into a location of your choosing (eg: variable,
object slot). The arg: summarize?
will print a failure summary of
each test-run after all of the tests are finished running. This is
useful for collecting separate results for many packages or systems
(see test-asdf-system-recursive). If no args are provided summarize?
is defaulted to true.
Lisp-unit2 provides TAP (test anything protocol) test results (printed in such a way that jenkins tap plugin can parse them).
with-tap-summary
prints tap results as the tests run write-tap
,
write-tap-to-file
accept a test-results database and write the TAP
results either to test-stream or a file
asdf:test-system
is assumed to be the canonical way of testing a
every system, and so lisp-unit2 makes effort to work well with
test-system
Here is an example asdf:test-sytem definition, which will print the verbose summary of the tests as they run.
(defmethod asdf:perform ((o asdf:test-op) (c (eql (find-system :symbol-munger))))
(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :symbol-munger-test)
(let ((*package* (find-package :symbol-munger-test)))
(eval (read-from-string "
(lisp-unit2:with-summary ()
(lisp-unit2:run-tests
:package :symbol-munger-test
:name :symbol-munger
:run-context))
"))))
Additionally, lisp-unit2 provides test-asdf-system-recursive which accepts a (list or single) system name, looks up all its dependencies and calls asdf:tests-system on each listed system. Any lisp-unit or lisp-unit2 test-results-dbs are collected and returned at the end. A failure summary is also printed for each result db (so that after running many tests you are presented with a short synopsis of what ran and what failed.
There is an interop layer for converting test results from other systems to lisp-unit2 test results, so that we can gather and summarize more information. Currently this is only implemented for lisp-unit1, but patches would be welcome to allow collecting test results from any other lisp test systems. (This is currently a bit tedious, simplification patches welcome as well, see interop.lisp).
Signals are used throughout lisp-unit2 to communicate progress and results throughout lisp unit
missing-test
: when asked to run a test that does not existtest-start
: when a unit test starts, contains a ref to the
unit-testtest-complete
: when a test completes contains a ref to results for
that test (test-result)all-tests-start
, all-tests-complete
: signaled at the beginning
and end of run-tests, contains a ref to the test-results-dbcollect-test-results
: used in it interop to send results to
with-test-results
assertion-pass
: signaled when an assertion passesassertion-fail
: signaled when an assertion failsAll signals have an abort interrupt which simply cancels the signal. This is mostly used for meta-testing (ie: testing lisp-unit2), but there are conceivably other uses.
Contexts allow you to manipulate the dynamic state of a given unit-test or test-run. These are functions of a single required argument (a thunk), that they execute inside of a new/changed dynamic environment.
A good example is the with-failure-debugging-context, which simply invokes the debugger whenever we signal a failed assertion
(defun with-failure-debugging-context (body-fn)
"A context that invokes the debugger on failed assertions"
(handler-bind ((assertion-fail #'invoke-debugger))
(funcall body-fn)))
Both define-test
and run-tests
accept a tree of contexts that is
flattened and turned into a single context function (see
combine-contexts
). This function then executes the body-fn for us
(see: do-contexts
).
This should allow any type of manipulation of the current lisp-unit2 environment through access to handling signals and setting up and tearing down dynamic environments.
Example Contexts:
Example test-with-contexts defintion:
(defmacro db-render-test (name (&rest args) &body body)
`(lisp-unit2:define-test ,name
(:tags ',args
:contexts
(list #'test-context #'dom-context #'database-context )
:package :test-objects)
,@body))
test-database
: a list and some indexes of all installed testsunit-test
: an object containing the name, code, contexts, and
documentation for a single unit-testtest-results-db
: a collection of results from a single run-tests
calltest-result
: the result of running a single unit testfailure-result
: information useful for debugging failures (eg: unit-test,
the form that failed, the expected and actual results)